Anna-Anastaia: the old and new versions and discussion

Text
Leseprobe
Als gelesen kennzeichnen
Wie Sie das Buch nach dem Kauf lesen
Schriftart:Kleiner AaGrößer Aa

3. Thus, as the denial of recognition of the Berlin police killing of FS, so and the statement about the identification of the Berlin Police AA as FS – all this is merely a by BELIEF and PRESUMPTION (PRESUMABLY) of G. King!

Thus, we can be assured that FS was killed (by Grossmann) in 1920 … And we can assume that King & Wilson's book is just only a pseudo-historical mystification (or hoax?), based on an initially false hypothesis (or even a whacker?) that AA was FS.

2.2 FRANZISKA SHANZKOVSKA at DALLDORF HOSPITAL in 1917.

In addition, another truly deadly fact for all supporters of FS: she had been a patient at the Dalldorf hospital four months in 1917. And then she (FS?! – according King&Wilson) came back in 1920 as Froilein Unbekant! And noone recognized her! How was it possible? – In 1917 FS was 21 years old in 1920 – 23 \ 24. Teenager aged 13-16 years, can significantly change a face and other part of body up to 20 years, but this is not that case: FS could not change over the 2.5 years (21-24) so that no one knew her there! Some more details:

At the beginning of 1917, FS was transferred to the State Institue for Welfare and Care in Berlin's Wittenau distric, Dalldorf. She stayed there four months. … End of March 1920 AA ( Froilein Unbekant!) was sent to Dalldorf Asylum. 17 June 1920 AA was fingerprinted and photographed. These photographs were sent from Berlin out to Stuttgart, Brunswick, Hamurg, Munich, Dresden… (Weimar Republic). Places in Berlin, which probably included FS asylum where she spent some time more than once, were checked throughly.... From the beginning of Autumn 1921, when AA announced she as GD Anastasia, and especially since the beginning of 1922, she attracted attention in Dalldorfe. Including, apparently, she attracted attention of the doctors and nurses – including, obviously, those doctors and nurses who worked in Dalldorfe in 1917 (when FS was there for four months).

All this taken together does not leave absolutely no doubt that if AA was FS, she would be being identified as FS:

– or at registering in Dalldorfe in March-April 1920,

– or when trying to identify her persona and thorough inspection in July 1920,

– or when her persona began to attract attention in the winter 1921\1922 and spring 1922,

– or in any other day of her two-year stay in Dalldorfe.

Moreover, after a stay in Daldorf – by fate – in the years 1922-1925 AA was under the scrutiny of police inspector (F.Gr;nberg). AA met inspector Gr;nberg in August 1922, periodically lived in his apartment, including without interruption from January to 19 June 1925 (six months!).

ROTR, p. 110 King&Wilson give us words from Gruenberg's detailed police report:

>>Anastasia is not adventuress, not, in my opinion is she merely the victim of a delusion that she is the Tsar's daughter. After living with her for a number of months, I have become firmly convinced that she is a lady accustomed interourse with the highest circles of Russian society and it is likely she was born to a regal rank. Each of her words and movements reveals such a lofty dignity and commanding bearing that it is impossible to claim she learned these characteristics later in life.<<

King and Wilson cite it, but rejected, as all the other extensive evidence in favor of AA.

3. Diagnosis and reports of professional psychologists

I wrote about this before (see section "A short list of evidence of identity of Anna Anderson and Anastasia."), but I must repeat here some quotes in the context of a discussion of the book King and Wilson

G. King reject (without any reason, as "little meaningful opinion"(!)) the reports of seven attending doctors of AA (four of whom were well-known psychiatrists) that they (I quote) "exclude any kind of fraud or hypnosis in AA claims to be Anastasia" ("Anastasia. The riddle of Anna Anderson" by Peter Kurth \ in Russian, p .103, 104, on my reverse translation \).

In particular, Dr. Bonhoeffer wrote:

"Her posture, facial expressions and elegance in manner of speaking suggests that she derives from an educated family … She probably grew up surrounded by a great princess, she was a daughter of an (military) officer or some sort of a court of the tsar's family … She could not take over all of the books or stories of other people." ("Anastasia. The riddle of Anna Anderson" by Peter Kurth \ in Russian, p.103, 104 \).

In addition, I cite below the evidences of psychiatrist from sanatorium "Shtillehaus” in Oberstdorf, where AA was in the autumn and winter of 1927 (" Anastasia. The riddle of Anna Anderson "by Peter Kurth \ in Russian, p. 150-153). Dr. E. Saathof (Chapter the sanatorium) in the final diagnosis wrote: "It is absolutely impossible that Frau Tchaikovsky – an impostor." Dr. Saathof also wrote: "I consider it impossible that this woman was from the lower classes of society … I think it is absolutely impossible that this woman was deliberately played the role of the other woman. Moreover, the observation of her behavior as a whole does not contradict her assertion that she was the one who calls herself."