Buch lesen: «Running Wild»

J. G. BALLARD
Running Wild

Copyright

Fourth Estate

An imprint of HarperCollinsPublishers

77–85 Fulham Palace Road,

London W6 8JB

www.harpercollins.co.uk.

First published in Great Britain by Hutchinson in 1988

Copyright © J. G. Ballard 1988

The right of J. G. Ballard to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Design and Patents Act 1988.

Introduction © Adam Phillips 2014

Interview © Vanora Bennett 2008

A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.

This novel is entirely a work of fiction. The names, characters and incidents portrayed in it are the work of the author’s imagination or are used fictitiously. Any resemblance to actual persons, living or dead, events or localities is entirely coincidental.

All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions. By payment of the required fees, you have been granted the nonexclusive, nontransferable right to access and read the text of this e-book on-screen. No part of this text may be reproduced, transmitted, downloaded, decompiled, reverse-engineered, or stored in or introduced into any information storage and retrieval system, in any form or by any means, whether electronic or mechanical, now known or hereafter invented, without the express written permission of HarperCollins e-books.

HarperCollinsPublishers has made every reasonable effort to ensure that any picture content and written content in this ebook has been included or removed in accordance with the contractual and technological constraints in operation at the time of publication.

Cover by Stanley Donwood, with background colours partly formed from combustion of ammonium dichromate carried out by Dr Roy Lowry at Plymouth University; photographed by Anna Walker

Source ISBN: 9780006548195

Ebook Edition © OCTOBER 2014 ISBN: 9780008120269

Version: 2014-11-19

Contents

Cover

Title Page

Copyright

Introduction by Adam Phillips

From the Forensic Diaries of Dr Richard Greville, Deputy Psychiatric Adviser, Metropolitan Police

Postscript, 8 December 1993

Keep Reading

Interview with J. G. Ballard

About the Author

By the Same Author

About the Publisher

Introduction

by Adam Phillips

‘I don’t think I’m allowed to forget Heart of Darkness. If the phone rings, it’ll probably be Joseph Conrad, saying, “Mr Ballard, you stole it all from me.”’

J. G. Ballard, The Hardcore 8, 1992

In an interview given in 1988, the year Running Wild was published, Ballard said that despite the variousness of his books he was still mostly thought of as a science-fiction writer:

The reason is, of course, that I take a hard, cruel look at the everyday reality around me in Western Europe and the United States, and I see science and technology playing an enormous part in creating the landscape of our lives and imaginations … As a writer I’ve always had complete faith in my own obsessions. It seems to me that the obsessional approach to life is very much the way in which the twentieth century conducts its business.

He is called a science-fiction writer because he takes ‘a hard, cruel look at the everyday reality’ around him. And he sees science and technology ‘creating’ our internal and external worlds. What makes a writer of science fiction – or, indeed, a writer, like Ballard, of utopias and dystopias, of satires and farces – is a certain way of looking at ordinary contemporary life. And it may seem cruel because it exposes what the everyday tries to conceal, and it is hard because it is unyieldingly unenchanted, and undistracted by what it sees.

One of Ballard’s obsessions was just how dystopian utopias always are, as the twentieth century made abundantly clear. Ballard’s heroes and heroines often have the idealistic monomania of Conrad’s Mr Kurtz in Heart of Darkness. They are people who want something so much that they forget all the other things they might want. And, indeed, all the things other people might want. It is the incredible cruelty people are capable of in realising their dreams and ambitions that haunts Ballard’s extraordinary fictions. Ballard’s look is cruel because of the cruelty he sees in everyday contemporary life. What he describes in Running Wild is the hard cruelty of parents being unduly kind and understanding to their children, parenting being one of the commoner ways people attempt to realise their dreams and ambitions. And how this particular hard cruelty – what Ballard calls ‘the regime of kindness and care which was launched with the best of intentions’ – gave birth to its ‘children of revenge’ (it gives nothing away – because Running Wild is determinedly not that kind of mystery story – to say at the outset that this is a book about a group of children who kill their parents). The phrase, as always with Ballard, whose verbal subtlety is often preternatural, is ambiguous. It makes us wonder what kind of revenge the parents in this terrifying novel may have been taking by treating their children with this particular kindness and care that is itself a regime? And why it might be that the children want to take their revenge? Why has revenge become the issue? If the road to hell is paved with good intentions, what kind of intentions should we have?

Regimes are one of Ballard’s preoccupations, as they are for everyone (the retrospective question is always, what did I consent to, and what did I have to submit to, as a child, that I didn’t actually agree with?). Ballard grew up in Shanghai during the Second World War, spending nearly three years, as a young boy, in an internment camp. ‘Anyone who has experienced a war first-hand’, Ballard said, ‘knows that it completely overturns every conventional idea of what makes up day-to-day reality. You never feel quite the same again. It’s like walking away from a plane crash.’ There is always an eerie sense in Ballard’s fiction of disasters waiting to happen, ironically because his characters are usually living in the aftermath of a disaster that has already happened. Ballard’s characters live in a world of after-effects, of a foreboding that somehow connects the past with the future (once you have been in a plane crash you half expect the next plane to crash). And Ballard’s account cannot help but make us wonder what it is like to experience a (world) war, that we experience at second- or third-hand. What the effect might be on us of the wars that came before us, and of the contemporary wars that we live through in the media, the technology that Ballard believes has also changed everything?

The children in Running Wild – children of the 1980s, but compared in various parts of the novel with, among others, the Baader-Meinhof Group, the Viet Cong and the children of the House of Atreus – are trying to walk away from the plane crash that was the extraordinary wealth and comfort that some people acquired in Thatcher’s England, so soon after the previous plane crash of two devastating world wars. The parents of these children are types we have become all too familiar with – merchant bankers, stockbrokers, private doctors, entertainers, psychiatrists, media executives, company directors; all referred to in this book as ‘the miscreant super-rich’ (‘miscreant’ meaning also a heretic, an infidel, and so asking us to ask what the rich should be true to, or believe in?). They live in gated communities, which are themselves a sign of threat, however undefined (a contradiction that Ballard would write about with such percipience in Super-Cannes). Surveillance – what the narrator calls, in a memorable phrase, ‘surveillance of the heart’ – security and order are everywhere, continual, casual reminders of disarray and danger in the offing (the ‘community’ in Running Wild is described as ‘a warm, friendly, junior Alcatraz’). It is not merely, as Ballard both hints and insists, with his strange mixture of vision and bafflement, that the ways we protect ourselves sustain our dread; that our efforts to forget about our vulnerability make it more daunting. It is that we provoke the nightmares we fear, as if to get them over with. Or as if there is something implacably self-destructive about the way we live now.

The Oxford Dictionary of National Biography describes Ballard’s work, apparently straight-faced, as concerning ‘Eros, Thanatos, mass media and emergent technologies’. So much the better. The Life Instinct, the Death Instinct, and Technology. What seems finally to prompt the children to ‘massacre’ their parents is the significant fact that a BBC2 documentary is about to be made about their perfect community. The children use the technology they have to coordinate their attack. Propaganda and terrorism: the terrorists using the weapons of their oppressors. All this is a familiar story by now, but not quite so familiar by then. ‘Madness as a way of finding freedom’, the narrator suggests. Freedom, then, is still a value. But the children seem to use their new-found freedom, as it turns out – and Ballard leaves this just about uncertain – for further terrorist acts. They make an assassination attempt on Margaret Thatcher, who is never named but referred to as a ‘former prime minister’, now sometimes known as ‘the mother of her nation’ or ‘Mother England’. Another parent who knows best, another person who knows how we should live.

The parents in the appropriately chosen Pangbourne Village – all the names in Running Wild are there to be noted, not least Reading and the Reading police, about whom we read so much in this book – look after their children with assiduous love and care, and the children murder them all. This is at once some kind of joke, because Ballard is, like Swift, a kind of comic writer – the narrator clearly relishes the irony, so to speak, of it all – and some kind of prophetic warning (we don’t always know when Ballard is being arch because he so determinedly avoids being portentous: Ballard’s seriousness always has a strange lightness). It is always important in Ballard’s novels that we never quite know where the narrator stands; we know more about his suspicions than about what, if anything, he could be said to believe in. And this is what makes Ballard’s writing, and particularly perhaps Running Wild, so timely. Because Ballard is writing in the ruins left by those people who knew, and know, all too exactly what they believed and where they stood, the fascists, the communists, the born-again capitalists, whom he pointedly refers to, in shorthand, as ‘the way in which the twentieth century conducts its business’; the business that ran – and is still running – wild.