Simple Truths of Life

But the aforementioned voting still takes a lot of time, as it distracts people from their responsibilities (work) to society. Moreover, there are times, such as war, when a democratic voting will cause the death of the entire nation. Therefore, it is logical that you need to have one leader. It is also logical that this leader should make those decisions that will benefit the people. This leader must be honest, wise, and intelligent, and he must not be a member of any political party. Here knowledge about spirituality will help us. People who have accumulated spiritual knowledge in their Astral body during their previous lives will not do bad things towards anyone in their life, starting from childhood. Such people will be able to be sincerely committed to striving to do their best for their nation.

How do we find such people? Thao advised Michel that people follow the example of the continent of Mu, whose people were the most organized on Earth in its entire history.

People in each village (as well as dachas and other rural settlements) and urban areas will elect a person who will meet all of the above parameters. No one with a record of bad conduct or a tendency towards fanaticism during their current life could be chosen. Such people are chosen for their honesty and purity, not for the promises they made but could not keep.

Thus, I might not have been selected because of my two childhood episodes, when I laughed at a girl with my friend, and when I decided to roll around in the snow the guy who was younger than me. My other life decisions should also serve as a block, but you would not have known about them if I had not personally and honestly told about them. I mention this so that you understand that the choice of the leader of the village and the district should be approached very, very seriously, and there is no need to be afraid of anyone or anything if you know that someone has done something wrong during their life – otherwise there is a chance that because of your silence the whole country will suffer, and you too will have to suffer for your mistake.

Also, a person cannot appoint himself as a candidate. If someone says that he wants to be the candidate from the village/district, then this is a clear sign that the person is hungry for attention and power. Such a person cannot be chosen as a representative.

If it so happens that there is no person who meets all the necessary parameters in a village or district, then they do not choose anyone.

Further, these selected people will be sent to the nearest city, where further elections will be held.

These midterm elections are held in the same way as the final ones, which I will discuss in the next paragraph:

All elected representatives from all over the country will meet in the capital. There they will be divided into groups of six people each. Each group will have their own conference room, and they will spend 10 days together – talking, eating together, and the like. Eventually they will choose the leader of the group.

If 60 representatives came to the capital, and they were divided into ten groups, then there would be 10 group leaders. Of these ten, 7 would be chosen in the same way, and then they would choose the Supreme Leader.

We can initially determine the number of representatives who will come to the capital for the final elections by dividing the country into virtual zones. For example, in order for 60 selected representatives to come to the capital, we need to virtually divide the country into 60 zones; then we divide each of those zones into further zones, and this process goes on until we have several dozen villages and city districts in one mini-zone.

What about cities where population density is currently very high? In my apartment building, for example, there are about 500 apartments, and about 1000 people living in the house – which is the approximate number for the villages’ population. In other houses there are fewer people. It might be possible to combine several houses into one zone for the election of a representative if the total number of residents does not exceed 1000 people. Otherwise, a representative is chosen in a single apartment building.

Thus, the chances are that the 7 leaders will most likely not know each other and will not be in cahoots.

It is worth noting that in Mu, a leader was only elected in this way if the previous Supreme Leader died without appointing a successor, or the successor was not unanimously approved by the Council of Seven. I would leave it to the people to decide by voting if they want the Supreme Leader to be able to appoint a successor or not.

If the Supreme Leader shows the slightest tendency to dictatorship, then the peer council of six must overthrow him. If for some reason this does not happen, then people initiate a voting to overthrow the entire council of seven and then initiate new elections using the Mu method.

The Supreme Leader's vote is worth two votes. If four are against him, and two are with him on a specific issue, then they will be at a deadlock. They will spend hours or days debating until one in seven changes their mind. This discussion is held in the context of intelligence, love and concern for the people.

These people do not receive any material benefits for leading the country. This is their vocation, and they do it out of love to serve their nation. This way we avoid the problem of hiding opportunists among the leaders.

Since the Supreme Leader is a spiritual person who really helps people and works for them, there is no fear that he will rule the country together with his six assistants for the rest of his life; there is no need to replace leaders every few years, as is now the case in many countries on Earth. Six assistants, whom the leader did not know before the election, and who are also spiritual people, will overturn him in the event of the slightest signs of dictatorship from the Supreme Leader. And if it suddenly turns out that the majority, or all 7, will take the path of dictatorship (but the chances of this are very, very small, since they are all spiritual people), then people will be able to initiate a vote (referendum) on a complete change of government, and they will choose a new one. At the same time, having worked out their mistakes – namely, in the fact that you need to responsibly choose a person at the first stage of the election, as well as at all other stages.

In the event of the death of one of the 7 people on the council, the process of choosing a replacement will occur again.

Since all the rules (laws) will already exist after people vote for them, the responsibilities of The Council of 7 will include such things as the introduction of new technologies that should improve people's lives, and in no way harm them; construction of roads, educational institutions; and stuff like that.

All Leadership Meetings are broadcast online. Hidden, but still recorded, only those meetings that are of a secret nature, since unfriendly people can use that knowledge and information to harm the country and society in any way possible. But since people have power, they can declassify the recorded meetings by voting in which the vast majority of people vote for declassification (I would say at least 81% of all voters, provided that at least 81% of all people who can vote have voted).

If people want to change something that they believe is harmful to the entire society, or they want to add something that, in their opinion, should improve the lives of all people, then they can submit a proposal to the local vote. If a certain percentage of people from nearby settlements approve this proposal, then it will go to the nationwide voting. I believe that local voting is necessary in order to shield most people from poorly thought-out ideas. Additionally, only people with relevant education will be able to create proposals. The same applies to voters, as I said earlier.

Accordingly, in such a society with proper self-organization there will be no need for rallies. Here we can draw an analogy with your house and the workers you hired to remodel the interior. This is your house, and you can do whatever you want with it (provided that it does not harm others). You do not go to a rally when you want to make changes to the work being done, do you? But you consult with the family, who also live in that house, until you reach a common solution. If the workers refuse to do the work, then you simply fire them and look for other foremen. And if the workers suddenly declare to you that this is now their house, and they do not want to leave it, you simply call the police, and then look for adequate people for your repair.

People make decisions that they think will either preserve the happiness they already have or will do more good by eliminating suffering. We make these decisions depending on what life situation we are in in the material world, and on what material and spiritual knowledge we have in relation to this particular life situation. Obviously, we still do not know a lot about life, and therefore there is a chance that we will find and learn something that will help us make our lives even better and fairer. This means that the model of organization of society proposed by me can be changed by society with the accumulation of new understandings. For this reason, the model I proposed cannot have a name, but only has a description:

Spiritually oriented organization of society based on the Knowledge about the Universe and on the known Laws of the Universe.

You just read a detailed description based on my current knowledge in this Manifesto. (I have an idea that it is better to try not to use names, but to use only descriptions when the conversation is about things that are important to society. This will eliminate misunderstandings, since people may have their own not very accurate understanding of the word, as they never went to look at the description of the word in vocabulary – especially if they heard it during their childhood and are already accustomed to their false understandings. For example, in my childhood I often heard the word “скомуниздить” (the “communism” is the root of the word, and it means “steal; take something by force from someone”) from friends, and until a certain time I had small, but nevertheless negative associations in my subconsciousness about communism; although the description of communism not only has nothing bad in it, it strongly resembles the organization of society that I propose – in fact, I add only how to choose the right leader in the country, taking into account the still little-known knowledge about spirituality and reincarnation, and that it is worth keeping a balance in all 3 relationships of a person with resources/products).

This is all that is required for a normal, spiritual life, where people live in complete freedom, which at the same time does not go beyond logic and common sense.

If you are not satisfied with some individual details, then there is nothing to worry about, since if this document is circulated enough among the people and then they initiate a public open voting for a new form of the spiritual organization of society, you will be able to subsequently put forward your ideas for consideration and subsequent voting in case there are enough people who agree with you.

In general, there will be no laws we are used to. There are only the Laws of the Universe which dictate what is right and what is wrong. Many of the Laws of the Universe are already well known to science and people with common sense; with the acquisition of new knowledge, people will adapt to new realities, which will bring more and more benefits to human society. But there will be rules for artificially created things – for example, traffic rules, or rules for using different tools.

Everything is free in the country which has a positive effect on the psyche of people who are not afraid to lose their jobs and become left on the street because of this. People give back to society for the years of their education and life by the fact that they work and, accordingly, want to keep social life in motion. The grains will not sow themselves, and then collect in bread and go to the mouths of people. We need to do something to maintain our free, healthy, and spiritual way of life.

Also, there are no contracts, no agreements, since nothing can go against the will of a person. People can and should restrict a person's will only when that person either commits a serious crime or his actions heavily infringe upon the free will of other people. As I mentioned earlier, minor offenses are first punished with a warning, and only after that, if a person is stubborn and does not want to learn, his next minor offenses are punished with a restraint of freedom for a short time, which will increase with subsequent similar violations.

As you probably know, there are people who practice different behaviors and activities that are contrary to Nature. Examples of these are homosexuality, anal sex, orgies, gender reassignment, etc. These are all mistakes, but if people want to do this, then this is their right, provided that they do not deceive anyone and do not force anyone to do anything. Naturally, they will not be able to talk about such things in front of children who may decide to try to engage in erroneous activities, since they do not yet have the necessary knowledge to understand what is a mistake and what is not.

It is worth saying that I had a little argument with a guy who defended the homosexuality of modern people, and as his evidence, he used animals that have sex with members of the same gender. It should be remembered here that all creatures (animals and people) have free will, and therefore the fact that some can freely choose to use the tool (body and/or its various components) given to them by the Superior Intelligence for other purposes (not as intended by the Spirit) is only a manifestation of the privilege to exercise one's free will. As it was said earlier about people, all those sensations that the Spirit does not want to receive are filtered out by the Higher Selves, and the actions that caused those sensations that the Spirit does not need are errors. How does one know the true purpose of the instrument? Logic and common sense will help here. Would you try to use a screwdriver to hammer in nails? Yes, sooner or later you could hammer in a nail with a screwdriver, but you would have a bunch of abrasions and wounds, and all the effort simply would not be worth it. It is more logical to use the right tool for every existing thing and not know suffering. To some extent, we can say that each instrument has its own pair, like creatures.

I think that it is worth giving access to such sources of harmful information only to those who have a general education. Otherwise, there will be problems, since people perform actions based on their knowledge – and if there is no correct knowledge in the person’s soul, then false data will lead the person to an error. People should be able to understand where the mistake of those people and their ideas lies. Someone may say that this goes against the free will and choice of a person, but I do not think so, because people just need to take a training course, educate themselves, and after it they will be able to watch, read, listen, etc. whatever they want – they will have a very simple opportunity to gain access to harmful knowledge. For example, currently people in my country graduate from eleventh grade at the age of seventeen, and official access to adult material begins at the age of eighteen.

I must say right away that in the event of a mistake in their knowledge and conclusions, people should have a way to eliminate that mistake in the easiest way.

Science also needs a balance, a golden mean, when people study all the theories put forward and do not dismiss the possibility of the existence of certain things; people understand that they do not know everything, and they understand that there is a possibility that in the past people may have made a mistake in scientific conclusions about one thing or another.

I believe that there should be a special organization that will consider and research new theories about the work of the Universe and life. Thanks to it, people do not have to fight against the wall of skepticism in order to reach people's minds. The Council of Seven can play a key role here too.

Therefore, if members of minorities do not agree with some of my conclusions regarding some of the details, they can appeal them. Of course, society still has the final say, since it has power almost always.

I propose that each person can only own two properties (but this does not mean that a person should strive to own two properties). People will be able to leave their property as a legacy to others if they want. And if the owner dies, then only his relatives will be able to carry out operations with the property for some time, for example 1 year, or they can give up the property so that other people, if they wish, can register it in their own name and live in it.

Registration itself can take place in a couple of minutes, if not seconds, using the Internet. And the data can be written directly to a memory card in a passport, where information about a person's education and health can also be stored, so that there is no heap of different documents – of course, copies of all data will be stored in the standard archives of the relevant organizations. Also, in the passport there may be a GPS or GLONASS chip, which a person can turn on with a mechanical key to send an SOS signal to the rescue service – for example, if a person gets lost on a hike in the mountains, etc. Now it is not so important where that chip will take energy for its short work – I am just giving an example of how modern technology can be used with benefit.

It must be remembered that usually people create families. Therefore, it turns out that two people can in theory have 4 properties – which is more than enough. Of course, people should remember that they should not have more than they need. Otherwise, they will make mistakes, followed by suffering. But I can understand that many will keep land plots, where their relatives used to live, for their children.

This is done only because in the countries like Russia people are used to living in cities in winter, and they leave for their villages and dachas in the summer. Therefore, many already own at least two properties. Of course, with the development of technology, people living in Russia will be able to live during cold winters in villages that will be significantly different from the villages we are used to today with their sandy roads, often dotted with holes and other irregularities, and with no shops.

With an adequate approach we will be able to lay normal roads, build houses for everyone who needs it, build a building in each settlement where food and other things necessary for a person's daily life will be supplied as needed. For more specialized things and tools, such as electric saws, computers, etc., one will have to travel to the nearest big city.

Accordingly, people will have their own personal cars, and public transport will also remain.

Non-working people (who have never worked and do not really want to help society for feeding it) will not be able to receive multi-room apartments, cars, land plots, or change housing. But they will be able to freely take vital products, things, and tools in the corresponding buildings where these things are available (currently we call them “stores”).

From everything else they will be restricted. For example, it will be possible to have each person have a card where it will be recorded whether he works or not. If so, then using the card he will be able to open a shelf, freezer, display case, etc. with the product he needs; if not, the lock will not open. A person will just need to just start working in such a job, the activity of which is vital for people.

Such measures are necessary, since with a large number of people who do not help society in its functioning in any way, but at the same time want to live in a multi-room apartment or drive a car, society will experience the consequences of a mistake. There is a difference between building a house and preparing food, is there not? Which one requires more time, resources, and energy to be spent on?

It is worth trying to persuade such people to work by educating them. But you also need to remember about the Laws of the Universe about human free will. The pressure and negativity towards them will not bring anything good to anyone.

Even though the unemployed eat and live in a one-room apartment, but this is better than if they tried to steal – be it outright theft, or deception for the purpose of material gain, and cases are not rare when bandits even kill other people for their own temporary material enrichment. Besides swindlers, there will be no prostitution. We can say that people exchange crimes in their society for the feeding of several parasites – and this is a reasonable choice.

But I do not think that we will have many people unwilling to work and help society. I think psychology will play a role in getting the unemployed to go to work somewhere to help others, thanks to whom they have food and everything else. In addition, the opposite sex is unlikely to want to create a family with such a person – another reason to help other people, each of whom does the same. As they say, one for all, all for one.

Probably it is worth saying here about myself. You know from my book that I had years when I worked and when I did not. For the last 2 years I have been living from the rent of my apartment, which gave me the opportunity to officially translate Thiaoouba Prophecy book into Russian, and now I am writing my own. Both books are free (e-books) and can help people. Then I also share my knowledge in videos, which also take a lot of time to create. This activity is also important for people and can help them – even if not everyone can see it immediately due to the lack of certain material and spiritual knowledge. To some extent, I compensate with my activity for the fact that I have not been working for several years. After all, knowledge is also a vital resource for people.

Accordingly, people need to give back to society, and not try to make their lives better than other people’s lives. Since everyone is doing the same – giving back to society with their work – then a person will have everything he needs, and no one will threaten his “wealth” since everyone will have about the same thing. Different people have different tastes and interests, of course.

The more knowledge and technology people have, the less people need to work to create the required amount of products. But we must also remember that technology should contribute to spiritual development, and not confine people more and more withing the materialistic world.

Further, the decrease in the total working day is also influenced by how many people work.

Thus, the number of working hours per week depends on how much products are needed to maintain the normal functioning of society; on the technologies by which these products are produced; and on how many people work.

For spiritual and intellectual development, people need to have free time so that they can engage in activities that interest them, walk in nature, and just spend time in the company of other people. At the same time, people should do something so that laziness and the idea that someone will do the work for them does not develop. For this reason, people should not automate production completely, since this is an extreme that will lead to the fact that over time people will stop self-educating and become lazy, waiting for the machine to feed them and provide them with all the necessary things. Let it be a couple of hours a week, but people need to work.

I think it is worth touching on the famous topic of public toilets in the absence of money in society. Since public property belongs to all people in the country, I do not think that people will litter and sully at their home, so to speak.

Then people will be taught about the real purpose of the Universe and about the fact that mistakes will have to be paid with suffering according to the Law of the Universe. If people know about these realities of life, then they will additionally not want to spoil those, thanks to whom they, in part, have complete freedom and everything necessary for a healthy life – otherwise they will harm not only others, but also themselves.

Then high technologies and automation come into force. Nobody will have to dig in the sewers with their hands if we make the appropriate tools. It is not difficult at all. It is the same with cleaning – there are already robotic vacuum cleaners. I see absolutely no problem with robots washing the floor and cleaning public toilets at night. Of course, the less people pollute, the better.

It is the same case with the streets. People will litter less, as they will understand that they are doing worse to themselves and not to the janitor.

Moreover, regular clean ups could be arranged so that people do not forget that their decisions and actions affect their environment. The less they litter, the less cleaning they will have to do. Of course, nothing prevents the use of high technologies here to simplify the work.

I would like to note that, as it seems to me, now people litter and spoil urban things because of the created division in society into different classes and layers. In the spiritual organization of society, people will feel much more united than under capitalism, when everyone is for himself – one for all, all for one, as they say – more people will help others, and not reject them. Even now, some people pick up other people's garbage and throw it into the trash can. So, once while walking near Semyonovskaya, I saw a young woman who was walking in front of me and suddenly went to the lawn, picked up the garbage, and then threw it into the nearest trash can.

Therefore, there is no “problem of toilets and garbage” in the spiritually oriented organization of society, in which there is no money or politicians. It may exist at the initial stage, when some people do not yet have certain knowledge and understandings, which I spoke about earlier, but over time there will be less and less of them if society tries to teach them about culture.

The army is naturally needed. If a society does not defend itself, then it increases the chances of becoming conquered. The size of the territory occupied by a society on the planet, as well as the natural and geological parameters of this territory, also directly affect those chances. The spirituality and freedom of a society also play a role if it is surrounded by capitalist countries where the Laws and Truths of the Universe are little known, or people do not believe in them. A completely free society that does not use money would be a very good example for those people who still choose to use money to get everything they need to sustain their lives within their country – if the price is not too high for them.

Healthy people go to the army by choice. Gender does not matter, but women should think carefully if they want to push themselves too hard. Naturally, pregnant women cannot serve. Also, people will be able to stop their military training at any time.

Self-defense is one of the most serious things, and it should never be underestimated. Depending on the technological progress of the country and the external geopolitical situation, people need to have a constant percentage of military personnel. If there is a decline in people who want to study military science, then it is the task of the seven leaders and news services to notify the public about the shortage and explain why it is dangerous for the entire nation. The goal is to encourage people to make the decision to undergo military training that should not last more than a year.

Naturally, there will be people who will devote their entire lives to military service. Such people should exist, since there are things that require deep knowledge and great experience. Also, there should always be a military buffer to repel a surprise attack from a potential aggressor.

We also need to talk about the exchange of products with other societies (other countries). If there were only two societies on the planet, and they did not want to unite with each other in one country, then they could exchange products with each other directly (barter exchange). For example, a certain number of cars for a certain number of apples. Such an exchange can only take place if one of the countries cannot produce on its territory what the other one produces.

It is worth saying that the climate can also play a role in the exchange of products. So, for example, a country that is located in the south and has access to the sea may enable people from the northern cold country to enter it for swimming and sunbathing. Then the northern country will give the southern one a predetermined amount of products for each tourist.

Only in very rare cases will people have on their territory everything they can possibly need. People will not have anything that could interest another country. In these rare cases, trade will not be possible, but those countries will be able to unite if the people of both vote in favor.

But what happens when we have more than two countries?

It must be said that direct product exchange is still more than possible, but only if each country has something that it can offer to give to another country in exchange for the products it receives from them. If one of the societies cannot give anything to the other, then the money comes to the rescue – and this is the only case when they are really necessary and useful.

Before going any further, let me remind you that the tools themselves cannot be evil. The way we choose to use tools can bring pain and suffering if we misuse that tool.