Simple Truths of Life

I also have a lot to learn, and perhaps some messages could have been written a little differently, while others not written at all. But I did not want to become enrolled in the friend zone on top of other things.

In any case, whatever the future may hold, I might not have this experience and just be sitting alone with my work. At least this way I got some experience and learned something new from it.

Now, even though this summer experience is not quite what I originally intended to find in my life, but in return it gave me some important knowledge that can help me both in life and in my search, and these summer events also smoothly transfer us to the next unnumbered chapter of my book where I will tell my thoughts on how to properly organize a society so that people live in justice, honesty, and happiness.

Manifesto

In this manifesto, I am talking about hypothetical countries, except for those cases when a specific country is indicated in the sentence.

The word “spirituality” in this manifesto has little (if any) relation to any religions, and it refers, rather, to knowledge about the Superior Intelligence and the reasons for the creation of the material world, the Universe, as well as to the interaction of individual people with other people and creatures in the Universe. You can learn more about spirituality, as well as of other interesting and important things, in Michel Desmarquet's free e-book “Thiaoouba Prophecy” (also known as “Thiaoouba: The Golden Planet”).

I will start by mentioning the known to me foundations of life which will become the building blocks of my ideas in this Manifesto:

The Superior Intelligence (Spirit) created everything that exists materially.

People exist physically for the purpose of spiritual development. The reincarnation of the soul (Astral body) plays an important role in this development, since people can look at the world from different points of view, which depend on the material and spiritual knowledge accumulated by a person.

There is knowledge and there is faith. In simple words, faith is something that exists in our imagination, but not beyond it, knowledge is something that exists in our imagination and beyond.

Everything material is a simple vibration that creates in everything two extreme values with a balance in the middle. Everything that exists is under the influence of these vibrations and, accordingly, also has duality, balance, and periodicity in its features. That is, being in the middle, with a reasonable approach, gives the most fair and harmonious life.

There are wrong and correct actions/decisions. A person pays with suffering for each of his mistakes: instantly or after some time, which can be counted in lives. Wrong decisions include doing nothing and reworking something, excess work – balance also needed here. Correct decisions lead to a positive result, to happiness. Because of this Universal Law, it is beneficial for all people to come to a spiritually oriented organization of society, regardless of their position in society.

To maintain their existence, beings (in our case, people) need to have access to resources such as food, water, air, light, knowledge, minerals, etc.

To create tools, you need to have 3 ingredients: knowledge of how to make the tool; the resources from which the tool is created; and technologies/tools for creating a new instrument. Our physical body (hands, legs, etc.) is also a tool, with the help of which we can create the simplest tools, and then use them to create more advanced things.

Duality is also reflected in science. Blind faith in something on one side of the scale, and blind rejection of any little-known natural phenomena on the other (many scientists make a mistake here). The golden mean is when people study all the theories put forward, and also do not reject the possibility of the existence of certain things; people understand that they do not know everything, and they understand that there is a possibility that in the past people may have made a mistake in scientific conclusions about some Universal Laws.

Each person seeks to benefit for himself and makes decisions based on his material and spiritual knowledge that he has regarding the life situation in which he is.

Having almost finished writing my book, I realized a very interesting, important, and simple truth about what kind of social structures can ever appear on the planet.

We need to remember the sinusoid and gradient, where the bottom and top zones are errors, and only the part that is in the middle is the right choice, since it is completely balanced, containing the correct elements of the bottom part and the correct elements of the upper part.

Further, we remember that for a healthy, harmonious life, people need to have access to knowledge and resources/products such as food, water, minerals, light, air, etc. We absorb some resources into ourselves, and they keep our human body alive, while other resources can be used by people to create tools to make human life on the planet easier. Here you need to remember Thaora's words that technology should assist spiritual development, not confine people within a materialistic world.

It is worth noting for a better understanding of my thoughts that at present modern society does not need to create some resources on their own (air, light), but in general situations may arise when people need to create those resources that are so commonplace for us. An example would be a space station or a city on a “dead” planet, if we allow ourselves to use the imagination a little, where people need to artificially create both air and lighting.

I realized a long time ago that there is a relationship between people and resources/products. A person either makes the decision on how to get or produce a product, or someone else makes this decision for him. Then there can either be a barrier (money, for example) between a person and a product, or the barrier may not exist. Once I wondered – what if there is also a third dimension, so to speak, between man and resources? This would be logical, given what I know about the Universe and life… And so, while working on the Manifesto and writing in a separate file the methods for people to get products, I wrote down that people can either produce products by their physical labor, or products can be produced by robotics… This was what I thought could exist – the 3rd direction in relations of the human being with the products he consumes.

Thus, there are 3 types of relationships between individual people and resources/products, each of which has 2 extreme values (erroneous), as well as one average and balanced value (correct).

I list them all in the table below where:

The first red row shows how people make decisions on how to extract resources and/or produce products.

The second green row shows how people produce products and/or extract resources.

The third blue row shows how people get different products and/or resources.

The extreme ways of self-organization of society are depicted in color; they are erroneous and will lead to problems, and people will suffer for their choice to live under such a social structure. In the middle column without a colored background, there are the most correct and reasonable ways of self-organization of society, in which people will not experience the suffering of the two most extreme ways of organizing society. By products, I also mean resources.

Each person decides by himself how to produce the products he personally receives.

The word “chaos” comes to mind.

Then some primitive society comes to mind, where each person lives by himself

The society has a leadership that makes decisions about the production of products in the country, and it also deals with other issues of the country.

At the same time, people in society have complete control over the country, which they can choose to exercise through universal open voting.

Not a single person decides how to make a product.

The total slavery of society can be an example; when one country completely controls absolutely all the people of the other; or, if we will go into what is still fiction, when people (by mistake or with malice) programmed robots/machines in such a way that all people become enslaved by them.

Products are produced only by people – by their physical labor.

That is, people make products with their own hands.

Hunters and gatherers, for example.

Some products are produced by physical labor of people, and some products are made by machines/robots.

Products are not created by humans.

It is produced by machines/robots, for example.

People themselves do not work at all, since everything is completely automated.

There is no barrier between a person and a manufactured product, and any person, without exception, can receive it.

Example: You enter a “store”, take the product you need and leave the store with it. No money or other restrictions between you and the product on the “shelf” of the store.

The manufactured products necessary for a healthy life are available to all people without exception (there is no barrier between a person and such products), and all other manufactured goods are available only to working people (there is a barrier between a person and a product, without which one can live a healthy life).*, **

There is a barrier between a person and manufactured products, which can be a pass, money, etc.

If you come to the store, take the product you need there and go out with it into the street without giving money to the cashier, then you will be considered a thief with all the ensuing consequences.

* Some vital products, logically, may include: clean water; food containing all vitamins and minerals necessary for a healthy body; minimal housing (1-room apartment or a small land with a small house) with all modern conveniences; access to knowledge and education; access to public transport; access to medicine and treatment.

** Some individual people might say that vital products are given only to workers, and personal cars, multi-room apartments, special types of food, etc. given only to those who do not work… Even though such a very strange idea of distributing food among the population is theoretically possible, it does not have common sense and is not logical.

Before I go into more detail about the average, balanced, and what I believe to be the correct way of organizing society, I would like to take a moment to explain why I think that the most extreme ways of organizing society are wrong and will lead to suffering.

First red row:

The extreme, where each individual person decides by himself how to produce products, brings up two pictures.

One picture is some primitive society that does not have technology, where each person tries to get food for himself as best he can. There is no mutual help between people, and the knowledge acquired by one person will disappear after his death instead of being preserved and serving as a lesson to other generations. As a result, many people in this very extreme way of organizing society will suffer, making mistakes because of their ignorance.

Another picture is the same fragmented society as in the previous example, but here people have technology. Because each individual person does what he wants in the absence of a general order and general rules of behavior, conflicts between people are inevitable in such chaos.

As for the other extreme, I hope you yourself perfectly understand why the total slavery of society is a mistake. By the way, if we move by one or two steps on the scale towards the golden mean, then we will receive serfdom and slave-owning societies that we had in our history.

Second green row:

When all products are made exclusively by people, people have to work very hard. There can be diseases, psychological depression, and high mortality. On the bright side, it can be noted that people are in nature, which is the focus of their attention – people cultivate their spirituality, observing how the world around them works.

As for the extreme, when all products are made exclusively by machines, robots, I remembered a saying about free cheese that exists only in a mousetrap. Since machines will do everything for a person, a certain number of people may lose the desire to learn and develop themselves, which will lead to a lot of mistakes and suffering; other people will also feel the consequences of the wrong decisions of people with little education. Then there is a negative thing in the fact that many people might focus their attention on the material world and they will not have time to develop their spirituality; as a result, people will have to stay for a life or two on the planet of the first category.

Third blue row:

When absolutely all manufactured products are accessible to absolutely all people in society, including those who do not want to work, then those people who work may begin to experience negative emotions and thoughts from the fact that not working people can receive exactly as much as they do – this will lead to conflicts. Perhaps many people will have no incentive to work at all, which will negatively affect their psyche and place even more burden on those who work.

It is worth clarifying that by work here I mean such activity, the result of which will give society vital resources and products. That is, acting, streaming on the Internet, manually decorating dishes, etc. is (in a balanced society without money, for example) a hobby, but not a job.

At the opposite extreme, there is a barrier between human and product, which may well be money. Many people strive to accumulate as much money as possible; since there is a limited amount of money, an increase in money for one person means a decrease in money for another person; to some extent, the poor themselves enrich the rich when they buy their products. Another way to get more money from other people is through theft, deception, scam, etc. There may be homeless people in society; someone will engage in prostitution so as not to be on the street, or simply not to be a beggar. Then a price tag can be put even on people who are sold into slavery… and there are many other examples of why capitalism lies precisely in the extreme that brings people suffering.

Here we need to remember that each person does what he believes will make his life better (or keep his life situation at the same level, if the person feels good in it). Material and spiritual knowledge of a person influences his choice in each specific situation. This feature of life manifests itself very negatively in a society with any divisions – financial, political, etc.

For example, people with a lot of money and/or power may begin to see a threat in a poor society which also wants a better life, and, naturally, according to the aforementioned law, after acquiring new knowledge/awareness it will strive to achieve it. For the poor very rich people can also pose a threat, since rich exploit the poor for their high-income existence. There can be serious bloody conflicts if society does not know the basics of how spirituality works – I talked about this topic in my book, Simple Truths of Life, and I strongly advise you to read the free e-book Thiaoouba Prophecy which sheds light on many of the fundamentals of life.

The use of money within the country (for people to get any products and services in their own country) is not reasonable. Due to the duality of life, there are two extreme types of monetary system:

• 

Where there are no restrictions on how much money each person can have. This will lead to a few wealthy people (multimillionaires today), and the vast majority of people will hardly have enough money to get vital products and resources;

• 

At the other extreme is the equalization of the received money for all people, when each person receives the same amount, regardless of his work. This is not reasonable, since with this approach it is rational to remove money altogether from internal use in your country. People will be able to receive the same amount of products, but there will be no cashiers, financiers, bankers, and other people involved in finance; there will be almost no thieves too, which will reduce the number of police officers. All those people “freed” from the monetary burden will be able to work in other truly useful jobs for society, which will reduce the average working day in the country for all people.

Money also sometimes makes people stay in themselves, and not in reality, since there is no confidence in the future, in the depths of consciousness there is a reflection of fear of being left without money and becoming homeless.

Obtaining resources, knowledge, and technology also takes a lot of time and requires training. There is no need to have another artificially created resource (money) and litter your head with unnecessary information about all the complex intricacies of the work of that resource. And many people do not understand its work at all – so, I was surprised to find out that people do not know the exact causes of inflation! There are only theories! Theories about the principles of work of what we ourselves have created… But money does not even stand close to the technologies thanks to which we make processors and similar equipment, for example – there we really may not know all the laws of physics, but at the same time we know enough to create useful things for ourselves…

Socialism is also an unbalanced way of organizing society. Since under socialism there is a barrier in the form of money between a person and a product, all people suffer in one way or another. Because all people want to live without suffering, everyone will strive for a better life. Depending on material and spiritual knowledge, some people will try to pull society towards complete capitalism, while others, wiser, towards complete lack of money within the country. Since people who know the truths that I am trying to convey to the peoples of the Earth in this book would not make a choice in favor of socialism in the first place, the chances are that people who chose to live under socialism will make a choice in favor of capitalism due to the lack of critical knowledge – this is what we see in the recent history of many countries on our planet.

I will briefly talk about the now popular ideas of organizing a society where people are, or are very close, to all three extremes: each person decides by himself how to create products for himself; all products are manufactured only by robotics; there is no barrier between a person and a product.

Here are my thoughts on this way of organizing society:

In such a society, people do not work and do not feel like a single one, whole society. There is a division of people into those who are engaged in art, hobbies, and other self-developing things, and they are doing it only for themselves (and someone may be doing nothing at all), but for other people they do nothing; there is an alienation of people from each other. To some extent, this reflects the division of people under capitalism, where everyone works for their own survival. And any strong division of people in society foretells problems.

Here we can say that balance is when people do something (work) for other people, and at the same time they have enough time to do something for themselves (hobbies, education, outdoor activities, personal life, travel, etc.). I am reminded of the analogy Thao said about atoms that connect very closely together to create a brick or any other building material; if the atoms repelled each other, then disintegration would occur.

It can also be noted that living at an extreme point does not always mean that absolutely all people will make mistakes and suffer. This means that the consequences of living in such an extreme system will encourage some people with little spiritual knowledge to make mistakes that will cause others to suffer.

Next, I will briefly outline the basics of my vision of a balanced organization of society and talk about how, in my opinion, we can come to such a just life without any serious conflicts between different people.

The purpose of our existence is spiritual development through our physical bodies, which must be maintained in healthy condition in order for them to live and function correctly. Otherwise, we will suffer. The more a person becomes spiritual, the less he makes mistakes and, accordingly, causes less suffering to the particles of the Superior Intelligence (himself and other living beings). For this reason, the more spiritual society, the greater the chance of lack of money within the country – people will start thinking about the well-being of others, and not just about themselves. I think that people will come to a spiritually oriented order in society when they get tired of suffering for their own mistakes, their stubbornness will go away, and they will begin to learn from their mistakes, which they will be able to openly look at, and not try to erase their existence from their heads.

What maintains our bodies in life: healthy food, clean water and air, salvation from adverse weather conditions (housing). Since a person exists in order to develop spiritually, he needs to be able to be sometimes alone with himself and in silence (quiet apartments, summer cottages of a certain minimum area, parks, etc.), where a person can meditate, study calmly and go about his business.

To maintain our life, 3 ingredients are required: knowledge, resources, and tools (technologies) with the help of which people can create other tools for their needs (houses, tractors, cars, medical supplies, food, purified water, sewage, electricity, the Internet, etc.).

One of the main Laws of the Universe says that making a mistake leads to suffering. One of the most serious mistakes is limiting the free will of another person, or more precisely: imposing one’s will on another, in a way which deprives the individual of the privilege of exercising his own free will. Therefore, only self-discipline is needed. No one has the right to restrict the freedom of choice of another person if his actions do not harm other people – there is an exception if those other people consciously agree with such harmful activities in relation to them, which, of course, is still an error from the point of view of the Universal Law.

But one should also not forget about common sense and logic. If a person faces an imminent and rapidly approaching danger, and you can save him, then, of course, you will not make a mistake when you help him without his consent, while slightly influencing his physical body.

People, being part of the Superior Intelligence, depending on their material and spiritual knowledge, perform those actions that they consider will benefit them in the life situation in which they are. Knowledge is very important. The functioning of society is primarily based on accumulated knowledge. Therefore, people must have control over the affairs of their society, so that no one tries to introduce false knowledge that will lead to suffering. We call it democracy when people are in power.

I believe that people as a whole [society] have power almost always, since the movement of the whole society occurs in accordance with what each individual person does.

Here's an example. There is a ball that needs to be moved. When people have different levels of knowledge and understandings, they push the ball in the direction that they believe, based on their knowledge, will benefit them. If people push it from different sides with approximately the same force, then that ball will stay in place. If people understand that only by acting together they can move the ball, they will move it in one direction and make progress. It is people's different choices and actions that determine what the total direction the country will go to, not the written law which people can choose to follow or not to follow.

In the digital world, many people can vote from home. But it is necessary that vote only those people who have an education in the field on which they vote (new medical equipment – medical education, a new clean motor – engineering and/or environmental, etc.), otherwise uneducated people with a bunch of conspiracy theories in their head can cause suffering for the majority. General education will also allow voting on issues that do not require deep knowledge in certain areas.

Thus, people will not suffer because of the voting of uneducated people, and at the same time, the free will law will be respected, since if a person wants to take part in public affairs, he just needs to start educating himself and then pass exams to confirm his knowledge.

General education includes at least the following disciplines: the language of your country, the general laws of your country, spirituality, history, physics, biology, chemistry, psychology, mathematics, algebra, geometry, sociology, social studies, natural history, natural science, geography, ecology, astronomy. People should know about the duality of life, and should know the difference between capitalism and communism, private and personal property, freedom and slavery. Of course, they should know the descriptions of words, and understand that in the description of communism, for example, there is nothing that is associated with murders, as some politicians are trying to impose on other people with little knowledge.

Regarding the general laws of the country, with a correct and balanced way of organizing society, there will not be so many of them, and therefore it will not be difficult for people to remember them – there will no longer be a need for lawyers.

Spirituality includes teachings about such things as the Laws of the Universe, the Aura, the Astral body (soul), reincarnation, the Higher Self, the etheric force field – essentially everything that Thiaooubians taught us in Michel Desmarquet's book Thiaoouba Prophecy. Of course, I perfectly understand that this subject will be introduced only after people prove the existence of Auras, telekinesis, etc. Ideally, this should not take long, given that scientists can already photograph Auras and diagnose human health from them. There are other hints in Michel's book, as well as in Michel's audio interview with Michael Meanwell, on how to prove the truth of his report.

I think that it is worth including in the educational program the training to see Auras, as well as teaching telekinesis – so that people know about their existence, and not believe.

I include psychology, since the teachings about the work of our psyche are very important for a healthy life. As Thaora told Michel Desmarquet, it is in the area of the psyche that our current greatest problems exist.

Physical education lessons will certainly remain in school too.

Then I suppose that children should be taught about sex and Palantius (and about what love and spiritual affinity are) before people develop sex drive. Otherwise, there is a chance that adolescents will unknowingly make mistakes, sleeping with everyone (I know this from what I saw at school. And if it were not for my speech stupor and some other psychological problems that I had in my thirteen years, then there is some chance that I myself could have happily rushed to make such mistakes). Then, how can we get rid of sexually transmitted viral infections in such a society? The condom, as I hope you understand, is another barrier that prevents people from experiencing natural sensations during natural sex.

There are two types of teaching subjects: natural (created by the Superior Intelligence) and artificial (created by people; although from a certain point of view, they were also created by the Superior Intelligence). Natural have been listed above, and they are permanent – provided our knowledge is accurate. Artificial objects are not permanent and can change. These include subjects such as languages, computer science and programming languages, country laws, traffic rules, and everything else that was created by humans.

Regarding knowledge, we can say that they are finite, and we can show as a percentage, or just a number from the total of all knowledge, the progress of how much a person already knows from all knowledge of a particular subject, or from all knowledge in general (natural and/or artificial). This will show the person what else he can learn at school, institute, etc. The same progress can also show what a person still needs to learn in order to work in a particular institution.

Duality applies to laws as well. There are the Laws of the Universe which are immutable (provided that we did not make a mistake in our conclusions about how a particular thing works in the Universe), but there are also laws that were artificially created by people. Artificial laws should not violate the Laws of the Universe, otherwise suffering will follow the mistake. The word “rule” is more appropriate than “law”, since people decide for themselves how to live.

I would single out 3 groups that dictate the behavior of society:

The Laws of the Universe. We know about them from science and from the proof of the existence of certain things. Following the Laws of the Universe, we will make few mistakes and, as a result, we will suffer little;

Rules invented by people. Traffic rules, grammatical rules in the language, rules of self-organization of society, etc. – what should exist so that there is no chaos;

And recommendations. For example, wearing a mask and gloves during a coronavirus would be recommendations – naturally, people would be taught that the virus is not only real, but also dangerous; do not expose yourself and others to possible suffering. It is worth understanding and remembering that each person suffers only for his own mistakes. Even before the restrictions on freedom of movement, I thought about taking less walks during the virus, as I understood that if I got sick, I could die and I would not finish my book, which I consider quite important for people (you decide if this is so or not), and therefore I did not need restrictions and directions on how to live my life.